When I read about split testing, most of the time I see that the best way to conclusively determine whether a page performs better than another is to measure conversions. The only problem though is that to get an accurate number, you need at least 100 conversions on a page. I don’t know about you, but since I’m selling products, it would take me forever to get a decent sampling size.
Even if you were marketing CPA offers, that’s still a LOT of traffic you would need to drive to get 100 conversions on a page, and if you are trying to start a new campaign, you could be losing a lot of money waiting for those “definitive” results.
I have found out a few different metrics you can use to speed up testing, and give you early projections on a landing page’s potential. The reason I like this is that while these methods aren’t perfect, they will still help make better landing pages until you have a successful campaign running where you can afford to wait for 100 conversions.
Click-Throughs
If you are an affiliate marketer, then this can actually be a very good way to split test regardless. Your merchant’s sales pages are out of your control, so it may actually be a good idea NOT to incorporate them into your own testing.
Let me give you an example, say you send 100 people to 2 variations of a landing page, each promoting the same product. Landing page A has a 10% CTR, and landing page B has a 5% CTR. It’s obvious that landing page A is better, so you start a new split test.
Once you have created a great landing page, for example’s sake, one that converts at 25% CTR, THEN you can start measuring conversions as a metric, and see what merchant has the best converting product.
Now, say you drive 100 visitors a day to your landing page. If you hadn’t started by split testing with CTR, and were using the 5% CTR landing page, it would take you 5 times longer to get to 100 conversions than with the 25% CTR landing page.
Time On Page
This is an interesting concept; by measuring the time a visitor spends on a page, you can roughly gauge their level of interest. This method wouldn’t work as well for squeeze pages or CPA offers, but if you have a longer page, even a sales page, then this could really help.
The only problem is that you need to look at this on an individual visitor basis, something I haven’t found a free solution yet, since averages can have skewed results (one person visiting for an hour ruins everything).
I originally got this idea from a product called Conversion Prophet (which I haven’t tried yet). They use a three level system that ranks a visitor’s interest level. They call the levels attraction, interest, and desire.
It’s quite funny, because this is taken from a well known acronym called AIDA, or Attention Interest Desire Action, which relates to the selling process. As you can see, Action (or, a conversion), is last on the process, so these preliminary indicators could foresee a landing page’s potential.
Heatmaps
If you have a highly graphical landing page, maybe this will help. Are people clicking where they should? Are they clicking non-linked images? Could you move your main button to a better area?
I haven’t experimented much with mainly graphics landing pages, which are surely more relevant in CPA marketing, but I do know that Crazy Egg is a great tool for heat maps, and you can try it free.
So these are just a few ideas to get creative about split testing, just remember that even though these methods are supposed to speed up testing, you still have to be patient to get the most accurate results.
Leave a comment with your favorite ways of testing and optimizing your landing pages!


Ever find a niche that you think could be profitable, only to abandon it because you feel as if you would have no idea how to approach marketing it? I know I’ve gotten overwhelmed at times when thinking up a big new project to sink my teeth into, but ideas are just ideas, and it can be quite difficult to put them into action without knowing the outcome.



!

